Accelerated Life Testing
Physics of acceleration, Arrhenius/Eyring/inverse-power/Coffin-Manson models, test planning, censoring, ALT analysis, and extrapolation validity.
Get notified when this course is scheduled
One email when dates are set. Or skip the wait: run it as a private cohort, on-site at your plant.
- One email, no sequence
- Never shared
- Reply within one business day
Faculty
Faculty details for this seminar will be announced with the full schedule.
Fees
Early: $1,895 (payment 4+ weeks ahead)
Standard: $2,095 (check/ACH) · $2,165 (card)
Group discount: $200 off per attendee for 3+ from the same organization.
Also Available
- Corporate on-site delivery at your facility
- Private cohort sessions
- Digital curriculum licensing
Seminar Overview
Products are warrantied for years and developed in months; accelerated life testing (ALT) is the engineering discipline that closes that gap. This seminar is built from the authoritative reliability reference for the field — the ReliaSoft Accelerated Life Testing (ALT) reference — the same corpus that reliability engineers and QuART/ALTA practitioners use for acceleration models, test planning, and life-data analysis. The teaching material is the reference mathematics and methodology itself, not vendor marketing: acceleration models are derived and worked, not recited.
The curriculum follows the ALT arc end-to-end. It opens with the physics of acceleration: Arrhenius (thermal activation), Eyring (temperature plus reaction-mechanism realism), inverse power law (non-thermal stress), and the Coffin-Manson relationship for thermal-cycling fatigue — including when each model is valid and how over-stress invalidates them by changing the failure mechanism. It then covers test planning: which stresses, how many levels, sample size, test duration, and the censoring schemes (Type I, Type II, randomly censored, failure-terminated) that real programs live with. The final day is data analysis: fitting life-stress distributions, quantifying uncertainty and confidence bounds, and the model-validity checks that separate a defensible life estimate from a curve fit.
Attendees leave able to design an ALT program for a real product: choose the acceleration model, compute required sample sizes and stress levels from specified confidence targets, analyze the resulting data with censored observations, and extrapolate use-level life with honest confidence statements — then reconcile the ALT result with field data and warranty experience.
Ideal Learner
- Reliability and test engineers who must design or interpret accelerated life tests
- Design and materials engineers converting qualification data into life and warranty estimates
- Quality and warranty analysts reconciling lab ALT results with field return data
- Program managers who own durability demonstrations and sign-off decisions
- Automotive suppliers, electronics, medical device, industrial-equipment, and consumer-product manufacturers facing multi-year warranty obligations on short development cycles
Learning Objectives
- Select the correct acceleration model for the dominant failure mechanism — Arrhenius, Eyring, inverse power law, Coffin-Manson — and defend its validity limits for the material system
- Design an ALT test plan: stress types and levels, number of levels, sample allocation, and duration targets derived from specified reliability and confidence goals
- Apply censoring schemes correctly (Type I, Type II, random/failure-terminated) and account for suspended observations in the analysis
- Analyze accelerated life data: fit life-stress distributions, estimate model parameters, and construct confidence bounds on parameters and use-level life
- Detect invalid extrapolation — mechanism shifts, over-stress artifacts, poor model fit — and combine ALT predictions with field and warranty data for a defensible life claim
Consulting Sessions
Seminar attendees can sign up for individual consulting sessions with the instructor. Sessions are free for registered attendees, first-come first-served — sign up when registering by calling 248-539-0473 or during the seminar.
Seminar Outline
- Why acceleration works: stress-life relationships, activation energy, and the time-compression contract
- The failure-mechanism invariant: accelerating time without changing the mechanism — and the over-stress trap that violates it
- Usage-stress vs. time-stress acceleration; single-stress vs. multiple-stress models
- The ReliaSoft ALT reference framework: reliability functions, life distributions, and stress transformations as the course's working toolkit
- **Exercise 1: identify the dominant mechanism for three supplied failure modes and select/justify the acceleration model for each**
- Arrhenius: the thermal-activation model, reaction rate, activation energy, and its life-stress relationship
- Working the model: thermal ALT planning, level selection, and extrapolation to use temperature
- Eyring: extending thermal acceleration with the quantum-mechanical basis and additional stress terms (voltage/humidity variants)
- Model validity: glass transition and material phase effects, mechanism changes at high temperature, and honest limits of the extrapolation
- **Worked example: high-temperature ALT of a plastic-housed electronic module — Arrhenius fit, activation energy, and the use-level life estimate**
- Inverse power law: non-thermal stress (voltage, load, pressure) and its log-linear life-stress form
- Coffin-Manson: thermal-cycling fatigue, plastic strain amplitude, and cycling-count life
- Mechanical fatigue connections: S-N behavior, cumulative damage, and where Coffin-Manson meets material fatigue data
- Choosing between models when multiple mechanisms coexist; interaction and combined-stress considerations
- **Exercise 2: plan a thermal-cycling ALT for a plastic part using Coffin-Manson — cycle amplitude, count, and required test time from a target life**
- Stress level selection: maximum stress limits, spread across levels, and the allocation tradeoff (more levels vs. more samples per level)
- Sample size determination from confidence and precision requirements — worked with the reference methodology
- Test duration estimation and stopping criteria; optimizing for information per unit test cost
- Acceleration factor computation and its role in planning vs. its misuse as a marketing number
- **Exercise 3: design a complete ALT plan (stresses, levels, samples, duration) to demonstrate a 10-year life at 95/90 confidence — and compute what it actually costs in test time**
- Life data types: complete (uncensored) vs. censored (suspended) observations; right-censoring in test reality
- Type I (time-terminated), Type II (failure-terminated), randomly censored data — mechanics and consequences for estimation
- The reliability function R(t), failure distribution f(t), hazard function λ(t): the working vocabulary for all that follows
- Life distributions in ALT: an affiliated engineering firmial, Weibull, lognormal — selection by mechanism and physics
- **Exercise 4: given a censored dataset from a running test, compute rank-based nonparametric reliability estimates and discuss the censoring effects**
- Fitting the life-stress model: parameter estimation from accelerated data, likelihood concepts for censored data
- Confidence bounds: on model parameters, on reliability at use conditions, and on time-to-failure percentiles — and what each bound is for
- Model-fit diagnostics: probability plots, likelihood ratio tests, and residual behavior as validity evidence
- Uncertainty communication: the difference between "the model says" and "the data support" in a design review
- **Worked example: full analysis of a two-temperature-level ALT dataset with suspensions — parameters, bounds, and the honest life statement**
- Detecting mechanism change: curvature in the stress-life relationship, bimodal failure signatures, and the physics behind them
- Over-stress artifacts: what high-stress data teaches about use-level behavior — and what it does not
- Degradation-based ALT: when performance degradation (wear, drift, strength loss) is measurable before failure
- Step-stress testing: concepts, models, and the cautionary boundaries of its use
- **Exercise 5: given an ALT dataset whose fit degrades at the highest stress, diagnose the mechanism shift and re-derive the valid life estimate from the defensible data subset**
- The reconciliation problem: ALT predictions vs. warranty returns vs. field failures — why they disagree and how to use the disagreement
- Updating ALT models with field data; acceleration-factor calibration from early field exposure
- Feeding ALT results into reliability growth, warranty reserve planning, and design-change decisions
- Course capstone: attendees present their own ALT plan or dataset for instructor and peer critique
- **Exercise 6: capstone — from a supplied field-return dataset plus ALT results, produce a reconciled life estimate and a warranty-reserve recommendation, and defend both**
More in Track D — Reliability, Statistics & Compliance
- D-01 · Reliability Life Data Engineering — 3-day · Advanced
- D-02 · Reliability Prediction and RAM Engineering — 3-day · Intermediate
- D-04 · Applied Statistics for Engineers — 2-day · Intermediate
- D-05 · Environmental Testing and Qualification — 3-day · Advanced
- D-06 · Warranty Engineering & Field-Failure Analysis — 2-day · Intermediate
- D-07 · Automotive Regulatory Compliance — 3-day · Advanced
- D-08 · Medical Device Regulation: EU MDR & FDA QMSR — 3-day · Advanced
- D-09 · Export Controls Compliance: ITAR & the EAR — 2-day · Advanced