Private cohorts & on-site
Format: 2-day (8:30 a.m.–4:30 p.m.)
Level: Intermediate
Location: Scheduled on demand · on-site at your facility or a regional venue
Date(s): Not yet scheduled for open enrollment. Get notified when it is, or book it privately for your team.
Includes: Certificate of Completion · printed slide binder · take-home reference text

Get notified when this course is scheduled

One email when dates are set. Or skip the wait: run it as a private cohort, on-site at your plant.

  • One email, no sequence
  • Never shared
  • Reply within one business day

Faculty

Faculty details for this seminar will be announced with the full schedule.

Fees

Early: $1,895 (payment 4+ weeks ahead)
Standard: $2,095 (check/ACH) · $2,165 (card)

Group discount: $200 off per attendee for 3+ from the same organization.

Also Available

  • Corporate on-site delivery at your facility
  • Private cohort sessions
  • Digital curriculum licensing

Seminar Overview

Most material failures are selection failures — the part was specified from a datasheet number that was true and irrelevant. This seminar teaches material selection the way it must actually be done: by building and defending property envelopes, the band of conditions (temperature, load, chemical exposure, moisture, time) inside which a specific resin — at a specific filler loading, in a specific conditioned state — actually performs. The course is grounded in two sources that rarely appear together: the resin-producer primary literature from the design-guides corpus (Covestro, BASF Ultramid, DuPont Delrin/Crastin/Zytel/Minlon, Victrex PEEK, BPF guidance, plus the Parker O-Ring Handbook and Loctite Design Guide for Bonding Plastics where elastomers and adhesives meet material choice), and a structured corpus of 900+ field-recorded plastic-engineering entries — 336 PRINCIPLE records, 118 MATERIAL ENVELOPE records, and 132 DECISION CRITERION records captured across four decades of consulting practice.

The field records are the course's spine because they carry what datasheets omit: real numbers and real outcomes. Glass-filled PP losing weld-line strength from 8,500 psi down to 1,600–3,200 psi at the knit line. Shrinkage running 0.030 in/in where the datasheet said otherwise. Dyne levels of 29, 31, and 42 and what each means for printing, painting, and bonding. Tolerances held at ±0.0005 inch — and which ones held and which didn't. CLTE behavior across filled and unfilled families. Every module pairs the handbook method with these recorded envelopes, so the class practices selection against materials as they behave in service, not as they behave in a tensile bar.

The differentiator: this seminar is taught from PRIMARY SOURCE material — producer design guides and documented engineering records — not vendor slide decks. You leave with a repeatable screening method you can defend in a design review or a supplier negotiation.

Ideal Learner

  • Product and design engineers who specify thermoplastics and thermosets for structural and functional parts
  • Materials engineers and applications engineers at resin producers, compounders, and distributors
  • Supplier-quality and SQA engineers validating material substitutions and "equivalent" resin swaps
  • Design-review leads and program engineers who must approve material choices and own their consequences
  • Industry segments: automotive OEM/Tier 1, medical devices, consumer products, electrical/electronics, industrial equipment

Learning Objectives

  • Distinguish thermoplastic from thermoset behavior at the processing and in-service level and justify the family choice for an application
  • Explain crystalline, amorphous, and liquid-crystalline polymer structure — and how structure drives shrinkage, chemical resistance, dimensional stability, and failure mode
  • Construct a property envelope for a candidate resin across thermal, mechanical, and chemical dimensions, using time-dependent (creep, stress relaxation) limits rather than datasheet spot values
  • Predict the property and processing consequences of fillers, reinforcements (glass, mineral), and additive packages — including anisotropy and weld-line knockdowns
  • Apply moisture and shrinkage kinetics (nylon conditioning, post-mold shrinkage, CLTE-driven dimensional change) to tolerance and fit decisions
  • Run a documented material screening against an OEM-type specification, producing a defensible selection memo with envelope evidence
  • Recognize the classic envelope failures: glass-filled weld-line strength loss, unconditioned nylon assumptions, room-temperature datasheet values applied at operating temperature

Consulting Sessions

Seminar attendees can sign up for individual consulting sessions with the instructor. Sessions are free for registered attendees, first-come first-served — sign up when registering by calling 248-539-0473 or during the seminar.

Seminar Outline

  • Processing logic, recycling logic, and service behavior: what the family choice commits you to
  • Where thermosets still win and why; TP/TS conversion decisions in practice
  • **Materials Case Study: a thermoset-to-thermoplastic conversion and what the envelope changed**
  • Semi-crystalline behavior: melting point, crystallinity effects on shrinkage, chemical resistance, and fatigue
  • Amorphous behavior: Tg as the ceiling, transparency, and predictable shrinkage
  • Liquid crystal polymers: anisotropy, high-temperature envelopes, and weld-line discipline
  • **PRINCIPLE record: why the same resin grades shrink differently in-flow and cross-flow**
  • **Exercise 1: classify an eight-resin shortlist by structure and predict each one's shrinkage and chemical-resistance class**
  • Continuous-use temperature vs. short-term peaks; heat-deflection temperature vs. reality under load
  • CLTE: unfilled vs. glass-filled values, anisotropy, and the numbers that decide interference fits and snap joints
  • Thermal aging and embrittlement as envelope edges, not footnote values
  • **MATERIAL ENVELOPE record: CLTE table applied to a mixed-plastic/metal assembly across a 90 °C swing**
  • **Exercise 2: build the thermal envelope for a candidate resin against a stated service profile**
  • Tensile, flexural, and impact values as snapshot data; the stress–strain curve behind the number
  • Creep and stress relaxation: reading isochronous curves, designing to strain limits rather than stress limits
  • Fatigue behavior and the data gap that causes molded-part fatigue failures
  • **PRINCIPLE record: design to strain, not stress, in a snap-fit under permanent load**
  • **Exercise 3: from isochronous stress–strain data, set the working strain limit for a 5-year loaded feature**
  • Chemical resistance logic by polymer family; solvent attack vs. stress cracking (ESC)
  • The dyne-level ladder — surface energies of 29, 31, and 42 and what each level permits for printing, painting, and bonding
  • UV, weathering, and sterilization as envelope modifiers
  • **MATERIAL ENVELOPE record: a bonding failure traced to an untreated 29-dyne surface**
  • **Exercise 4: assemble the chemical/environmental envelope for a washer-exposed exterior part**
  • Glass fiber: stiffness, strength, anisotropy, warpage, and the weld-line penalty
  • **MATERIAL ENVELOPE record: GF30-PP weld-line strength 8,500 psi base vs. 1,600–3,200 psi at the knit line — and the design change it forced**
  • Minerals, talc, and mica; nucleation; colorants and their processing side-effects
  • Additive packages: stabilizers, lubricants, plasticizers, and what they do to the envelope
  • **Exercise 5: choose between unfilled, talc-filled, and glass-filled grades for a dimensionally critical bracket and defend the tradeoffs**
  • Nylon moisture absorption: conditioning effects on dimensions, stiffness, and toughness; dry-as-molded vs. conditioned property traps
  • Mold shrinkage magnitudes (including recorded values such as 0.030 in/in) and post-mold shrinkage behavior
  • Tolerance achievement in practice: the ±0.0005 inch questions — which features can hold it and which cannot
  • **DECISION CRITERION record: when a tight tolerance was moved to a post-molding operation instead of the mold**
  • **Exercise 6: set achievable tolerances for a glass-filled nylon part in a humid service environment**
  • The screening sequence: requirements → envelope construction → candidate elimination → validation plan
  • Reading and challenging OEM spec sheets; substitutions and "equivalents" done responsibly
  • Documentation: the selection memo that survives design review and supplier negotiation
  • **Exercise 7 (capstone): full screening of a participant-supplied application — envelope, shortlist, and open risks — presented and critiqued**